BARRY VERSUS THE SUPREME COURT??

In order to become aware of just how much in contempt Barry views our Constitution, one would have to look no further than his reaction to the most recent Supreme Court decision. It is that same reaction that makes it abundantly clear that Barry, our resident egomaniac, now views himself as being somewhere above even the Supreme Court. Because of last week’s 5-4 decision, dealing with free speech, and the fact that corporations will now have the same rights that Unions have always enjoyed in they’re being able to make unlimited expenditures promoting, or attacking, political candidates, Barry and the Democrats seem to have gone nearly apoplectic. And since this whole freedom of speech idea is something that runs completely counter to the philosophy of Barry and the Democrat’s, they are now very busy squealing, and very loudly so, like the stuck pigs that they are. Throwing yet another of their classic hissy-fits, they have now set about busying themselves conniving in all manner possible, looking for any and all options that might be made available to them that can then be used in an effort to circumvent what they see as this most egregious of recent Supreme Court rulings. A ruling that struck a blow for freedom of speech, and struck down a century worth of limits on corporate political spending, is one Democrats are hoping will hand them a populist issue to be used to stem a growing Republican tide rising on public anger. Their little ploy may prove to be a success with some Americans, who because of severe brain damage, continue to support Democrats, but I don’t think it will fly with a majority of free speech loving Americans, at least I hope it won’t. To demonstrate his displeasure with this decision, Barry "Almighty" chose to devote his weekly radio address to condemn it as being some terrible miscarriage, doing his level best to portray it as nothing more than a victory for "special interests and their lobbyists." He went so far as to cite "one of the great Republican presidents, Teddy Roosevelt," who "warned of the impact of unbridled, corporate spending" on elections. BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. What Barry really hates is unbridled free speech, that’s what really sticks in his craw. How dare the Supreme Court take such action as the encouraging of freedom of speech.
Democrats now seem to be floating several ideas that may be available to them for combating this decision, including the proposing of legislation that would include the requiring of corporations to obtain shareholder approval before funding political advertisements as well as preventing companies from deducting election spending as a business expense on their taxes. Yet another scheme, which is essentially borrowed from the current rules of political candidates, would be to require the CEO of the corporation to make a declaration at the end of an ad saying, "I’m the CEO of X corporation and I approved this add." This stupid idea came from Rep. Chris Van Hollen, Democrat, who happens to head the House Democrats’ campaign committee. Man, you just gotta love these guys, they’re just so full of . . . . . "Hope and Change." RIGHT! When the Supreme Court interprets the meaning of a provision in the Constitution, its decision can only be overturned directly by a constitutional amendment. Therefore, any attempts made to circumvent the Judicial Branch of our government, at least in this regard, are blatantly unconstitutional, but that seems to matter very little to any of the Democrats, or to Barry himself. The rules are never meant to apply to them, there should be no constraints placed upon them or what they want to force upon the rest of us. We are always told that, regarding such things as Roe V. Wade, the court's decisions are meant to be final. Not so though for decisions that run contrary to the Democrats’ Marxist agenda!
Democrats have known that this decision was coming, they had anticipated it for months, and in the ensuing months have been busy preparing themselves so that when the decision was finally announced, they could, and in typical Liberal Democrat fashion, quickly roll out plenty of their classically deceptive political rhetoric and outrageous legislative proposals to combat it. When the news came out regarding the court's decision, I thought ol' Chuckie Schumer, Democrat, was going to vapor lock right there on the spot when he heard about it, throwing a fit that, while revealing his arrogance, was at the same time quite comical. This current batch of Democrats we have, are easily the most corrupt and power-hungry bunch of scumbags to come down the pike in quite some time. Arrogance, dishonesty and unethical behavior are the hallmark of these Democrats, so their whining about this decision should therefore really not come as much of a surprise to anyone. These individuals are proving to all that their motives are nothing if not remarkably sinister, and that together this group of political elites pose a very dark menace to our society that is potentially lethal to our freedoms. It must always be their way or the highway, the Supreme Court be damned. The day after this crucial decision was handed down, White House Special Counsel, some moron named Norman Eisen, Democrat, met to discuss Democrat options that could be used to combat this decision with aides to Mr. Van Hollen, Democrat, and Chuckie Schumer, Democrat, as well as Justice Department staff and some fella named Fred Wertheimer, some longtime "activist" for campaign-finance issues. Among options mentioned were such things as putting forth a plan that would bar companies who have received federal bailouts from being able to practice their constitutional right of free speech, for no other reason than that they took bailout money. Just one more reason that I think it would be safe to say a good many of those who took bailout money may now be sadly finding out that what they effectively did was to sell their soul to the Devil, with that Devil looking strikingly similar to Barry "Almighty."
Most Republicans have hailed the court’s decision as a victory for free speech. If you ask me it should have been ALL Republicans right down the last man and/or woman. Senator Jeff Sessions said it would help individuals acting "collectively through a corporation." Hence, Democrats, always ones to evade the truly important issues, will now attempt to paint the Republican position as one not really supporting free speech at all, but instead, as one favoring "even more big money and corporate special interests influencing the outcome of elections," Mr. Van Hollen, Democrat, said. Like Democrats always do, when all else fails, LIE LOUDLY AND LIE OFTEN, lie until you actually come to believe what it is you're saying. I feel like telling this guy to wake up and smell the coffee. I mean how much more money could possibly be thrown into the whole election process than there was into the election of 2008? An amount so vast that it literally permitted Barry to buy the election. There’s just one difference, the majority of that money came from Unions and guys like George Soros and was then funneled via any manner possible to Barry’s campaign. He likes to spend much of his time talking about leveling the playing field, well that is essentially what the Supreme Court did last week. Brian Walsh, a spokesman for the Senate Republican campaign arm, said Democrats are, as usual, putting their leftist agenda ahead of the "constitutional right to free speech and fair elections." Well I think we all know with some degree of certainty where it is that Barry and the Democrats stand when it comes to both free speech and fair elections. Firmly in the way! In a move that clearly demonstrates the point to which Democrats have sunk, a couple of screwy Democrats by the names of Rep. Leonard Boswell (Iowa) and Rep. Donna Edwards (Md.) have gone so far as to propose a Constitutional amendment to nullify the Supreme Court ruling. Now since we know that process requires approval of two-thirds of the House and Senate and ratification from three-fourths of state legislatures, success in this endeavor would at least appear to be pretty slim. So these two clowns are doing nothing more than showing the rest of us just how stupid they are.
All this recent talk coming from the Democrats regarding the dreaming up of ways to counter this most recent Supreme Court decision sounds eerily familiar to something called the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Play Act, the first bill signed into law by Barry "Almighty" upon his taking office a little over a year ago. This "union-backed" law essentially negated a 2007 Supreme court decision that candidate Barry "Almighty" spent a great deal of time criticizing throughout his campaign for making it harder for women to file discrimination claims. While previously there have been instances when Republicans have backed campaign-finance regulations, hopefully that’s not something that we will have to contend with this year. Even RINO John McCain, who we all remember as teaming up with Feingold to create an unconstitutional abomination that was advertised as something that was "needed" in order to crack down on corporate electioneering, said on "Face the Nation" that there is very little that can be done. "The Supreme Court has spoken," McCain said while predicting "an inundation of special-interest money into political campaigns." WA, WA, WA! Ya know what really ticks me off, is that all George Bush needed to do was to veto that monstrosity when provided with the opportunity.
And what is it exactly that has Barry and the Democrats’ panties in such a bunch? The answer is very plain. In recent elections the garnering of money has been rather skewed in the favor of Democrats, in that the majority of political ads sponsored by independent groups have favored Democrats. Labor Unions and wealthy Democrat sugar daddies like Barry’s buddy George Soros have literally sent millions of dollars to front groups who in turn tailored their political commercials to comply with restrictions that now no longer exist. Now Republican-leaning groups such as the Chamber of Commerce can spend freely to promote or disparage candidates.
There continues to be a blatant disregard for the constitution being exhibited by Barry and his entire administration and I have to wonder if it's something that is going to remain being tolerated by a significant number of the American people? Is it something that even matters to the majority of blacks in this country? Or, are they now to be considered as being nothing more than clones of Jeremiah Wright, so consumed with hatred regarding this country that they are willing to allow Barry carte blanche in accomplishing his goals that can only be described as forming an agenda designed to bring about the wanton and wholesale destruction of this country and all that it stands for? Here we have a man whose party has been put in firm control of the legislative and executive branches of our government, and therefore, some would say possesses a pretty firm grip on judicial branch as well, and look at the mess we're in. So if the decision arrived at last week and that caused such a major meltdown among Democrats shows anything at all, it's that it clearly laid bare the utter contempt with which Barry and his liberal comrades regard the necessity to abide by our constitution. They see themselves as being above all that nonsense, after all they know much better than a bunch of old guys from the 18th century regarding what's best for us today. They view the Constitution as being more a set of rather loose guidelines than as actual rules to be used to govern our Republic. To them the Constitution is etched in jello and can therefore be manipulated as necessary in order to allow them to advance their corrupt agenda. And they are not the least bit shy about doing whatever they see as being necessary that will allow them to continue their march leftward.

Please go to www.werewatchingyou.net