BARRY HAS SEEN THE ENEMY……AND IT IS “WE THE PEOPLE”

It would seem that we have in our current president, a man of whom I think it very fair to ask, just what "are" his priorities regarding Homeland Security? Is he more interested in waging a war on individual states which make up our Republic or, in maintaining a war to defend our very way of life against a known group of religious zealots who seek to bring about the untimely demise of that very same Republic? He is a man whose allegiance to his own country needs to be called into serious question. The time has come for him faithfully execute the duties of his office as far as dedicating some level of commitment to the safety and security of this country. He seems to have a rather unsettling lack of desire for the safeguarding of those who elected him and is far too willing to sympathize with those would mean us harm to the degree that should make most Americans rather uncomfortable to say the least. It would seem he finds it much easier to side with murdering Islamic fanatics than he does with those who have lost loved ones at the hands of these pathological zealots. In an interview with the Saudi-owned, Dubai-based al-Arabiya news channel shortly after taking office, Barry uttered what has to be considered as being a very revealing statement for a U.S. President, when he said, "my job to the Muslim World is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy." Whoa, now wait just a minute there hoss, where does it say anywhere in the Constitution that an American president has a role to play with the Muslim world as part of his job description? Since when does a president of the United States have a job to do for anyone other than the people of the United States?
Less than 3 months after assuming office, the Barry "Almighty" administration proceeded with providing us all with a very clear indication of the direction in which his administration would be going and where the focus of its efforts would be very specifically aimed. Practically right out of the box, through his many surrogates, he went about the defining of homegrown rightwing extremism as being the primary threat facing the United States. Taking it a step further, this rightwing "conspiracy" was described as something that could be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily "hate-oriented" (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups). Those individuals or groups to be on the watch for were mainly assessed as being antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely and may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. A DHS report that came out in April of 2009, was essentially nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at pure intimidation against those willing to speak out against what they see as a blossoming tyranny. It would seem that Barry has gone about the copying of a tactic used by his Socialist heroes of bygone days who successfully used such tactics, or worse, to silence any and all voices of dissent in order to consolidate their grip on power. He seems to be of the opinion that if he can succeed in the labeling of those who happen to be pro-life, strongly supportive of the Second Amendment, favor limited government, are against government ownership of healthcare and for closing our borders as being nothing more than right-wing extremists, he can then silence their critiquing, thus allowing him to move forward unimpeded with his ruinous agenda for America. It would appear that Barry is of the opinion that the 58 million Americans who “did not” vote for him or his brand of “change” are now to be considered as being more dangerous than those who fly planes into buildings or walk into public places and blow themselves up. With the takeover of our government by the Democrat Party becoming complete with the election of Barry "Almighty" in November '08, being a conservative has now come to equate as being nothing more than your basic, out of the mainstream, Nazi, and as someone to simply be ignored. Apparently, those of us on the right side of the political spectrum are no longer permitted to criticize those things with which we disagree without then risking being labeled as a crazed extremist or worse, a hate filled domestic terrorist. Just what is it that Barry is attempting to accomplish here? Is this all part of his master plan to create his “new” vision of America, a country where differing opinions are no longer encouraged but instead simply not to be tolerated. Looking back, efforts have continually been made to form some sort of connection between the 1995 Oklahoma City bombings and those evil, racist, homophobe, pro-lifers that make up this country's dreaded and extremely volatile right wing. You know, its funny that Barry, and Democrats in general, can ridicule any claim or simply dismiss out of hand that there was a connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda but can easily connect dots where none exist and make the connection between a nut like Timothy McVeigh and all conservatives. Some DHS spokeswoman, a bimbo named Sara Kuban said that this “assessment” put together by the agency, is one in an ongoing series published by DHS "to facilitate a greater understanding of radicalization in the United States." I guess by radicalization this bimbo means all those of us who refuse to join the sheep being led by Barry to slaughter.
And it would appear that the opinion held by the administration hasn't really changed all that much over the course of the last 14 or so months. Because in a speech given just this past Friday, June 18, by our stellar Secretary Homeland Security, Barry wants to remain focused on the fighting of homegrown terrorism. What is now being sought is the ability, by Barry's government, for the monitoring of all internet communications with us being told that while the implementing such a plan does involve a civil liberties trade-off, we shouldn't concern ourselves because it's for our own protection. After all, the U.S. government must take measures to beef up National Security. Can anyone possible imagine the Democrat outrage had this been something suggested by that evil and power hungry George Bush? According to this highly trustworthy and honorable administration that has been so completely above board and so thoroughly transparent in all that is has done, as terrorists increasingly recruit U.S. citizens, our government needs to constantly work to balance Americans' civil rights and privacy with the need to keep people safe. So said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. How come this excuse didn't fly when Bush was trying to keep everyone safe? Using typical hypocritical liberal-speak, 'Big Sis" Napolitano attempted to describe the difficulty in finding that balance and saying that the issue has become much more complex as homegrown terrorists have widened their use of the internet to actively reach out to extremists abroad for inspiration and training. Apparently, those contacts have spurred a recent rash of U.S.-based terror plots and incidents, which I guess she means as being potential man caused disasters. I thought we were told, and by this very same individual, that in all situations since Barry has assumed his duties, the system in place has always worked as advertised. "The first amendment protects radical opinions, but we need the legal tools to do things like monitor the recruitment of terrorists via the internet," Napolitano told a gathering of the American constitution society for law and policy. And the fact that these are U.S. citizens or legal residents raises many legal and constitutional questions. Not that this administration will let something as insignificant as the Constitution stand in their way. No way! Napolitano said it is wrong to believe that if security is embraced, liberty is sacrificed. Boy oh boy, how things do change. Here we have a president who would have absolutely no reservations whatsoever about misusing such an authority, and we're just supposed to go along with all this drivel. Funny, we couldn't trust Bush but we're supposed to think that we can safely trust this leftist bunch of hooligans now in possession of the Oval Office. I don't think so! She added, "we can significantly advance security without having a deleterious impact on individual rights in most instances. At the same time, there are situations where trade-offs are inevitable." "Most instances?" Boy howdy, these sure singin a different tune now that we have a corrupt, scumbag Democrat in the Oval Office. To grasp the meaning of the attempted chicanery here by our stellar Secretary of Homeland Defense when hearing comments such as these, you must have some understanding of how typical politicians speak. Napolitano is using many of the typical "buzz phrases" that politicians always favor when trying to paint in a positive light those things that they're trying to enact that are guaranteed to have an adverse effect on "We the People." Such verbiage as "security against threats", "protecting civil liberties" and "home grown terrorism" all are meant to do nothing more than to lull us into some false sense of security and are designed to make us think that the government is being responsible in its effort to protect us. But it's all nothing more than a smoke screen because what's going on here is that Barry is looking for an excuse to further stifle what he sees as dissent from the masses. Remember people, buzz phrases and buzzwords are what politicians use to get on the good side of issues for whom the only recipient of any possible benefit is the government. Once they're on the "good side" of the issue and they have the power, that's when they use said power to enact laws and regulations to stamp out dissent amongst those of us that they see as being those "home grown terrorists". The translation of that would be anyone who is against the current Barry undeclared war on our Constitution and our country. The whole idea of focusing on all those crazy, rightwing home grown terrorists instead of on those who actually mean to destroy our country is strictly one that is ideology driven. If you have any doubts about that you're not paying close enough attention. Because in the words of our, all things to all people president, any “partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is and what Islam isn’t.” And therein lies the problem, just what is Islam? What Islam is, is a philosophy which shares many of the very same goals possessed by Liberalism or "progressivism." And there should no doubt by now, regarding what Islam is not. It is not, in any way, shape, matter or form, a “Religion of Peace”, possessing anything that even remotely resembles the rich heritage to which, as Barry claims, the world owes it some great debt. The fact of the matter is, that if it is anyone who it owed a debt, it would be those who comprise the Muslim countries of the Middle East being in debt to the West. All of those supposed achievements for which Barry says we owe Islam some great debt, are things that either occurred despite Islam or can be seen as accomplishments of the better educated peoples whom Muslims conquered.
Despite Barry's effort to put lipstick on a pig via his description of Islam, every once and a while there comes a time when an enemy of this country inadvertently slips up, with them openly revealing why it is that they should be placed squarely in our crosshairs. Such was the case in 1977 in the form of a statement that came from Palestine Liberation Organization Executive Committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian State is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.” To show that things have not changed during the time that has transpired, here is another little side note. It is a fact that the Palestinians have now controlled Gaza since 2005, so any refugee camps that are there are strictly courtesy of Hamas. The Arabs, if they were in fact seriously seeking a Palestinian homeland, could have very easily created one during the 20 years (1948-1967) that Jordan and Egypt held the West Bank and Gaza, respectively. But, as history clearly shows, they opted not to do so. Even before that time, the Palestinians had been offered a homeland in 1936 and again in 1947, with Israel renewing the offer in 1967 and 2000. The fact that these people keep turning down these opportunities to acquire that which they profess to be all that they want, should very clearly reveal, even to Barry, that their goal is not to peacefully coexist, their goal is to annihilate Israel. Plain and very simple. No matter how determined the denial that flows from practitioners of this barbaric faith, throughout history it has been Islam that has always been responsible for the most gruesome, heinous and atrocious acts of violence ever committed anywhere in the World. And any denial through some feigned disgust or outrage is completely counterfeit. Deplorable acts of indiscriminate and cold blooded murder are committed by these dregs of humanity, these heathens, all in the name of their faith on nearly a daily basis. And it would seem that the majority of those who practice this misguided and oft ridiculously referred to, "Religion of Peace", and who are labeled as "moderates", see nothing wrong with this, or at least not to the point of caring enough to do anything about it. These people who for some perverted reason prefer to live in the 5th or 6th century, must be made to understand that there are many of us who actually do prefer the 21st century and all of the associated comforts. And it appears as a pathetic and blatant case of pandering to his audience when Barry made the idiotic statement, "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President John Adams wrote, “ the United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims.” He made such a statement shortly after assuming office while on a trip to Cairo, and in so doing chose to take some rather excessive artistic license with his painting of history. I’m a pretty fair student of American history and I don't seem to recall any Muslims playing any kind of role anywhere in the history of my country. The bottom line here that should be quite obvious, Islamist extortion and not Islam, that has always been part of “America’s story.” Is that what Barry “Almighty” meant? Because for one thing, Islam is not now nor has it ever been throughout its entire existence, anything that remotely resembles in any way, shape, manner or form, a religion of peace. Islam is nothing if not a violent, unforgiving, bloodthirsty, primitive and oppressive faith that is practiced only by some of the most sadistic and masochistic types of individuals on the entire planet. It is nothing more than an excuse to commit some of the most vile and heinous acts of behavior by those who then turnaround to claim that it is done in the name of their God. These people practice what they preach, which is nothing but unadulterated hatred, religious intolerance and violence. These people cannot, and should not, be trusted as far as they can be thrown, and they represent a very grave danger to this country on so many levels, and they should constantly be treated as such. The ability of American citizens to be able to consider themselves to be safe in they’re own homes, or when out in the malls or theaters is paramount. These people understand one thing and one thing only, the using of brute force. And we should not exhibit the least amount of hesitation about using it. They need to be made to understand should they continue with their threat against our country, they will be the ones made to face annihilation.
Minus the state of Israel, this entire region of the planet, except for the inventing of new ways for individuals to blow themselves up, is pretty much of a creative wasteland. With the amount opportunities that you would think would be abundantly available to the populations of these countries because of their vast oil reserves, what of any value either intellectually, scientifically, artistically or even philosophically have the people who populate this region contributed to the world other than a natural resource? And what have they done with the billions of dollars in oil revenue? Have they made life any better for those who reside in their respective countries? No! Well then, have they at least contributed some of their vast wealth to those who populate the poorer nations of the world? Nope! Well then I’m sure they have assisted those effected by various natural disasters such as the earthquake in Haiti or Chile, or the tsunami victims from a few years back, right? Nope, wrong again! What they have done is to spend incomprehensible amounts of money to literally poison the minds of million of their citizens, creating nothing more than religious fanatics and then exporting them to other countries to do their bidding. And any claims to the otherwise by Barry should be seen as exactly what they are, nothing more than empty rhetoric perpetrated in a effort to distract. The fact that these oil rich nations remain stuck in the 5th or 6th centuries is done so entirely by their own hand. The rest of the world need not accept any of the blame. And the fact America alone is responsible for the rescuing of millions upon millions of Muslims from everything from ethnic cleansing in Bosnia to the suffering experienced under Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan, earns us no appreciation. So what these demented fanatics have devised as being their only game plan is to attack is the very country that has been, and continues to be, responsible for saving the lives of so many of their brothers and sisters as well as mothers and fathers. And their reason for doing that? For no other reason than that so they can spend an eternity surrounded by 72 virgins, how twisted is that?